CSU Library Website Customization

Documentation of CSU Primo and LibGuides customization

Citation doesn't always pull publisher information

Problem:

Harry Potter has correct citation but Deep Work doesn't.

Deep Work Citation Example no publisher

 

The citation should look like

Deep work citation example with publisher

In Deep Work, the publication data is in a MARC 264 field, but the Harry Potter books have the publication data in the MARC 260 field. The 264 is new as of Sept. 2011, but catalogers didn't start using it until 2013 and later. Here's the field definition and scope. Information in field 264 is similar to information in field 260 (Publication, Distribution, etc. (Imprint)). Field 264 is useful for cases where the content standard or institutional policies make a distinction between functions.The PCC Guidelines direct the 264 to be used with RDA records. So newer works (Deep Work) will have a 264 field, but older works (Harry Potter) will have a 260.

Solution:

Primo Home > Advanced Configuration > Full Normalization Rule Configuration > 10COLSU_ALMA /PNX Section: Additional Data
Add 264 to both 
addata:pub and addata:cop

Originally, the normalization rule only include 260

Primo Additional data

After change

new primo additional data normalization rule

Under Normalization Set Editior for Additional Data -> City of Publication -> Click + on the right of rule 1 to duplicate the rule and change 260 to 264. Change Action to OR. Save the change, go back make another change for publisher. Save and click go back to deploy the change. Run Renorm. 

additional data normalization rule change

additional data normalization rule change

URL: https://libguides.colostate.edu/web_customization | Print Page